"Did you know that every second can be the difference between life and death in a hospital? Vital sign monitoring technology now enables the early detection of critical conditions, saving lives faster than ever before."
Modern medicine emphasizes not just treatment but also the early detection of complications to save lives and improve patient outcomes. Continuous vital sign monitoring has been proven to:
* The John Hopkins Hospital
A study conducted at Johns Hopkins Hospital showcases the profound impact of continuous monitoring in reducing complications and improving patient safety. At Johns Hopkins Hospital’s Zayed 11 East unit, where failure-to-rescue events were a concern, the implementation of continuous monitoring led to remarkable improvements. Key findings from their pilot program include:
Life-Saving Early Detection
Continuous monitoring identified critical conditions like:
Improved Patient Safety and Satisfaction
Patients reported a 98% satisfaction rate, stating they felt safer and less anxious knowing they were being monitored continuously. Comments like "I knew someone was watching over me" highlight the emotional reassurance offered by the system.
"Imagine if a small change in heart rate could be the first warning before organ failure occurs. How many lives could be saved with such early detection?"
Komitmen untuk Perawatan Kesehatan yang Lebih Baik
At ZENMED+, we are committed to advancing healthcare with innovative solutions, and our Vital Sign Monitor is a prime example of this dedication. Combining cutting-edge technology with practical usability, this monitor empowers healthcare providers to deliver proactive and efficient care.
Compact Design
Designed compactly, ZENMED+ Vital Sign Monitor is the perfect choice for place with high complexity and devices as well as small space such as ambulance, thus saving spaces.
Comprehensive Data Tracking
The monitor tracks key metrics:
References:
1. Miller, P.J. (2017) ‘case study: Continuous monitoring of patient vital signs to reduce “failure-to-rescue” events’, Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology, 51(1), pp. 41–45. doi:10.2345/0899-8205-51.1.41.